The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 사실오인 내지 법리오해 (1) E이 피고인의 얼굴을 손으로 할퀴면서 피고인의 손목을 내리쳐 피고인이 들고 있던 컵에 담긴 커피가 E의 얼굴에 튄 것일 뿐, 피고인이 고의로 E의 얼굴에 커피를 뿌린 사실이 없다.

(2) Even if the Defendant spreads a coffee on the face of E, the Defendant’s act constitutes excessive self-defense or excessive defense to defend the attack of E.

Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (three million won by fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the victim E's statement consistent with the investigation agency and the court of the court below, the victim's photograph and diagnosis of the victim's upper parts, and other evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the fact that the defendant intentionally spreads heavy coffee cited by the defendant to the victim's face, and thereby, the fact that the victim suffered two degrees of 'the days of treatment' in front of the left son and the part of the court of the court below, and the victim suffered 'the days of treatment' due to the fact that the defendant intentionally spreads the victim's face.

We cannot accept this part of the defendant's argument.

나. 법리오해 주장에 관하여 위에서 본 각 증거에 의하면, 피고인이 피해자와 말다툼을 한 직후, 먼저 피해자에게 뜨거운 커피를 고의로 뿌렸고, 이후 피해자가 피고인의 얼굴을 손으로 할퀸 사실을 인정할 수 있으므로, 피고인의 위와 같은 행위는 방어 행위라고 할 수 없다.

We cannot accept this part of the defendant's assertion.

C. The defendant denies the defendant's crime on the assertion of unfair sentencing.