A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. The criminal defendant against the victim B is the representative director of C with interest test, and D is the relation between the defendant and the actual operator of the victim B corporation and the defendant to receive a subcontract for cooling and heating works, ducting works, light load works, etc., or to provide the defendant with services or goods.

On June 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to D that “B corporation would pay construction cost upon completion of air conditioners and heating systems and light-weight partitionss construction, etc. in the dispatching-gu E.”

However, at the time of the completion of the construction work, the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the construction cost in full even if the injured party completed the construction work. As such, the Defendant had received the construction cost from the original ordering office and repaid the unpaid construction cost, and is proceeding with the so-called “refluence against return,” the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the construction cost.

Ultimately, even if the Defendant had the victim complete the above construction work and paid the construction cost in full from the original ordering office, the Defendant did not pay the victim construction cost of KRW 33,100,000,000 as stated in the list of crimes until October 2014, and did not pay the victim construction cost of KRW 39,95,00 in total as indicated in the list of crimes.

【Crime of Crimes】 The purpose of this paper is to introduce a false statement of heating, cooling, light-weight partitions, documentary air-conditioning (45 days), documentary air-conditioning (45 days), ALC block costs, and around August 2014, to the effect that (i) the amount of damage caused by deception of the date, time, place, and details of deception, (ii) the payment of construction costs would be made if he/she completed the construction on June 1, 2014, and (iii) the payment of construction costs would be made. On August 2014, 2014, he/she introduced a false statement of the victim to the effect that he/she would bring him/her into timber and pay it after bringing him/her out of the original purchase place, and (iv) he/she did not pay it to the victim, and (v) would have the victim paid it through F in return for his/her reimbursement of the expenses.