logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.10.17 2014고단2154
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(상습공갈)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Seized “the page stating contact point of the subject” shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2002, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months with prison labor at the Gwangju District Court for the crime of extortion and attempted extortion. On July 22, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Bribery) in the support of the Daejeon District Court, the Daejeon District Court on July 22, 2005, and on August 13, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor at the Changwon District Court on May 18, 2014.

After finding out the personal information and contact details of teachers, public officials, business persons, etc. of the Gyeonggi-do major school through Internet search, the Defendant was willing to receive money from the other party by deceiving the other party when demanding payment of money by making a phone call as if he had been a witness, although he did not have observed or taken a photographed the scene where he/she had entered a female and her contact with him/her.

On June 16, 2014, from around 09:30 on June 16, 2014 to around 11:30 on the same day, the Defendant called the victim C, who is a public official, by means of a public telephone at several times and sent it to the victim C, “ how is. . . . . . . . . . . 5 million won at the workplace. ... 5 million won is sent to the police, and there is no match. . We think well. We do not think well. . .. Doctrife is the head of the f. f. . d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d.) by means of the same method as from around August 22, 2014, and did not receive 5 million won from the victim and did not receive 26 million won in total, and did not receive the money from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's office against the defendant;

arrow