logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.12 2016가합522936
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 10,000,000 with respect to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from February 9, 2015 to June 12, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who, after undergoing a sex-type operation to correct the alteration of the inside of the inner area at the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Hospital located at 173-ro, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Sungnam-si, the Plaintiff was a person whose visual strength of the right-hand snow was deteriorated, Defendant B was a doctor who performed the sex-type operation, and Defendant Seoul Special Metropolitan City Hospital was a medical corporation operating the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant University Hospital and the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Hospital”) and the employer of the medical staff of the above hospital including Defendant B.

나. 원고는 2002년경 우측 상악골의 황문근육종 절제 수술 및 방사선 치료를 받았는데, 위 치료 과정에서 상악 뼈가 일부 제거되어 우측 눈과 상악부가 움푹 들어가는 안면 변형(안구 함몰)이 발생하였다.

C. On January 28, 2015, the Plaintiff was consulted with the sexual surgery of the Defendant Hospital for the correction of the said gale of the gale of the gye of the gye of the gye of the gye of the gye of the gye of the gye of the gye of the gye of the gye of the gye of the gye of the gye

On February 9, 2015, from around 09:40 to 17:10, Defendant B performed an operation to correct the location of the inner part of the inner part and the right-hand part of the Plaintiff as a freeboard (hereinafter “instant sex operation”).

However, at around 17:16 on the same day after the surgery, the Plaintiff complained of a decline in the eyesight of the right eye in the recovery room, and the Defendant B took into account the possibility that the pressure of the climatic pressure has occurred due to the correction of the location of the eye, the Plaintiff performed a re-control of the location of the transplant frame at around 18:15 on the same day, and began treatment of the Plaintiff’s right-hand eye through an internal and cliology from February 10, 2015.

On February 25, 2015, the Plaintiff discharged the Defendant Hospital in a state that the Plaintiff recovered the eyesight to the right-hand eye at a distance of 5cm on February 25, 2015.

E. Since March 6, 2015, the Plaintiff is on the part of the surgery.

arrow