logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.08.30 2018나2012429
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 26, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a contract and completed construction works. On March 18, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the co-defendant of the first instance trial on December 26, 2007, and entered into a contract for construction works of the 17BL apartment construction works and new construction works of the 17BL apartment construction works and the 12 construction sections in the 2009. 2) Thereafter, on June 25, 2011, the Plaintiff completed construction works of the 6 complex construction works and the date of completion of construction works of the 6 complex construction works and the date of completion of construction works of the 6 complex construction works can be confirmed as the date of commencement of the warranty warranty bond or the date of completion of the warranty bond construction works described in the 2011.

The date of completion of construction, machinery, and civil engineering among new apartment construction works for the three complex apartment complexes with the following shall also be July 27, 201. However, as in the same way, the starting date of the warranty period stipulated in the warranty bond shall be confirmed as the date of completion of the new apartment construction works.

The apartment complex newly built by this construction has been named as the apartment complex of the Han-gu Village 6 Complex (hereinafter referred to as the "Geul 6 Complex apartment complex").

3) Around August 11, 2011, Defendant Bodo Construction completed the construction of the 17BL apartment construction project, the construction of which was completed. The newly built apartment complex is the three apartment complexes of Han-gu Village (hereinafter referred to as “One-gu three apartment complexes”).

B. The order was issued. (B) The Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association concluded a contract for the repair of defects to assume the responsibility for the guarantee against the Plaintiff in the event of defects as provided in the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act and the Housing Act on the six apartment complexes in the Handong-gu. On December 1, 2011, each defect warranty bond issued by Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association to the Plaintiff under the Framework Act on the Construction Industry is guaranteed under the Framework Act on the Construction Industry.

arrow