logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.26 2017나2027110
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and all appeals by the defendant B, H, J and K are dismissed.

3. The Plaintiff and Defendant G have arisen.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff alleged that the appraisal value of the appraiser of the first instance on each of the instant real estate was excessive; (b) Defendant B, H, J, and K alleged that the appraisal value of the appraiser of the first instance on each of the instant real estate was so calculated; (c) it is difficult to view that the comparative case or appraisal method selected by the appraiser of the first instance court is against the empirical rule or unreasonable; and (d) it cannot be deemed that the market price of each of the instant real estate was excessively high or low; and (e) it is identical to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the reasons for the Defendants, and thus, they are cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. As such, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the Defendants is legitimate. Thus, the Plaintiff’s appeal and the appeal by Defendant B, H, J, and K are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.

arrow