1. Defendant F, G, H, I, J, K, K, L, N, T, U, V, X, Y, Z, AB, AB, and AC, respectively.

1. The grounds for the attachment of the claim are as stated in the corresponding part of the above Defendants.

2. Grounds;

A. Judgment by service by public notice of Defendant H, N, and AB (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

B. The remaining defendants' confessions each of the defendants (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3)1 of the Civil Procedure Act)

C. The part to which partial dismissal is partially dismissed asserts that the amount of each claim stated in the “amount of claim” as stated in the “amount of claim” as stated in the “amount of claim” is not the corresponding amount indicated in the “amount of appraisal” as stated in the “amount of appraisal” listed in the “amount of appraisal” listed in the “amount of appraisal” as to the simultaneous performance amount of Defendant B, C, D, E, M,O, P, Q, R, and S, not the corresponding amount.

However, the evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone cannot be deemed as particularly excessive in the appraised value as to the above Defendants’ share, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim against the above Defendants is accepted only within the scope stated in the text.

3. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is reasonable within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as there is no ground.