logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.04.21 2015구합1698
반납금 취소
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Progress in the course of implementing the employment success project;

A. On June 25, 2015, the Plaintiff participated in the business of the 2015 Employment Promotion (hereinafter “instant business”) conducted by the Busan Regional Employment and Labor Office affiliated with the Yang Regional Employment and Labor Office, and received employment consultation. The Plaintiff completed the employment promotion program from June 29, 2015 to July 2, 2015, and completed the employment promotion program on July 16, 2015, and was paid KRW 250,000 (hereinafter “instant participation allowance”) from the Defendant on July 17, 2015.

4.1.'s (Concept of 4.1) Participatory Allowances refers to the expenses to be paid in terms of food expenses and transportation expenses to the participants who faithfully participate in the first stage of the package, and to the participants who completed the first stage of the package of the package of the package of the package of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the expenses, taking into account the economic characteristics of the participants, etc. (on the part of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the expenses, (on the part of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class,

B. Of the Defendant’s business manuals of this case, the content of the participatory allowance is as follows. According to this, the participatory allowance is paid on the premise that the aforementioned participatory allowance was not a pre-employment by establishing the International AP. The Plaintiff acquired the qualification of employment insurance by being employed in the business place B as of July 3, 2015, which was prior to the establishment of the said IP.

C. Accordingly, on August 25, 2015, the Defendant confirmed that he had been employed prior to the first-stage employment ( July 16, 2015) ( July 3, 2015) in relation to the Plaintiff’s participation in the work of “the Plaintiff’s employment failure” (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s employment failure”) and sought to recover KRW 250,000 won already paid.

arrow