logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.11.28 2017고단3698
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On April 30, 2017, around 11:00, the Defendant heard from the police officer E belonging to the Yangsan Police Station D police box called to the scene after receiving the Defendant’s 112 report of domestic violence No. B 102 and 503 on April 30, 2017 to the outside of his residence in order to take emergency measures and hear statements regarding the crimes of domestic violence.

“The police officer interfered with legitimate execution of duties, such as handling the 112 report and emergency measures against criminal domestic violence, in a way that the police officer’s 112 report and breaths in a way that booms the face of drinking E, after putting him/her in mind, and threatening him/her to drink E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. In other words, the letter of decision-making, the place of work, and the list of reported cases;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In addition to the background and degree of interference with the execution of official duties in sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant was unable to resist at home under the influence of multiple times before and after the instant case, due to the fact that the police officer was dispatched due to the notification of denial, the Defendant’s excessive finding of the damaged police officer after the instant case (this is confirmed by the statement of the damaged police officer E), and the Defendant’s resistance against the mistake.

arrow