1. The defendant has each point of the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the land size of 36496 square meters in Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Changwon-si B forest land.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 6 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff is a company operating a marine transportation business, and owned the land B, 36,496 square meters of forest land (hereinafter "the land in this case") in Seocho-gu, Changwon-si (hereinafter "the land in this case"), for sale and purchase on December 30, 2003, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 5, 2004; 2 The defendant's absorbing the land in this case; 2 The defendant's absorbing the land in this case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's 80 square meters, 80 square meters

In light of the facts established above, the defendant has the duty to remove each of the buildings of this case and deliver each of the above lands to the plaintiff requesting the exclusion of disturbance based on ownership.

The Plaintiff initially filed a claim for the return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent for the instant land. Accordingly, the Defendant argued that the said claim for return of unjust enrichment was groundless since the Plaintiff impliedly infringed on the Defendant’s use and profit in accordance with the Act on the Conservation and Management of Uninhabited Islands, but the Defendant also withdrawn the said claim upon the withdrawal of the claim for return of unjust enrichment in accordance with the amendment of the purport of the claim made on June 20, 2016.

2. Conclusion