logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.09.04 2014구합51975
해임처분 취소결정처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit include the part arising from the defendant's participation.

Reasons

A. In light of the fact that: (a) the task related to the major academic research of the instant third party; (b) it cannot be readily concluded that it is the Intervenor’s private business; and (c) the Intervenor paid the price for the research subsidy to the instant third party as personnel expenses of private funds or research foundations; and (c) the instant decision that the instant third party did not constitute a ground for disciplinary action is lawful.

C. As to the ground for disciplinary action No. 3, ① Four professors, including intervenors, were examined on November 14, 201, 201. At the time of the examination, points assigned by examiners as follows. At the time of the examination, four examiners (including the title of this case) were removed from the above examination. The average score A (V) 958 958 965 296 40 40 40 10 25 10 2. 5 95 25 15 30 15 30 25 305 15 305 15 305 250 305 25 250 250 37 250 2500 2. 40 2. 30 20 20 20 20 . 4 200 . 30 . 4 200 . 3

arrow