logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.08.24 2018고합226
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 30, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the registration of loan business, etc. and the violation of the Act on the Protection of Financial Users in the Incheon District Court's Branch Branch on October 30, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Incheon Detention Center on January 6, 2016.

The Defendant, “2018 Gohap 226,” was aware of the victim D while working as a worker for daily work at the construction site around February 2017. From June 201 to June 201, the Internet gambling fund was needed with the victim while working with the victim. As such, there is insufficient money for the victim to need for surgery expenses even if his/her father and wife do not actually suffer from the illness and need for surgery expenses.

In order to continue to use the card to pay the card, it is possible to live together with his/her father.

It is necessary to pay directors' expenses and deposit money for lease because directors do not receive the deposit money for lease.

The money to be paid to others was received by means of false words, such as “the money to be paid to others,” and received money to use it for gambling purposes.

On February 2, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement at the F office operated by the injured party in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, stating that “The Defendant would pay credit card payments, card payments, or pay credit card payments, etc. to him/her without fail, after lending the card payments, his/her ancillary operation expenses, director expenses, etc. to the necessary things.”

However, the Defendant was thought to act as if he had the ability to repay part of the money received by the Defendant with cash to the victim, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money borrowed from the victim because he did not have the property in the name of the Defendant at the time and did not exceed KRW 100 million with bad credit standing, and it was impossible to issue the card.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby deceivings the victim.

arrow