Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall operate any automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance.

On March 20, 2014, at around 13:25, the Defendant driven a C Poter Cargo and proceeded in the front distance of the Sejong Northern-gu Spoon Integrated Logistics, which is located on the Spoon Road, from the west-gu, Daegu, the Defendant operated the said cargo vehicle not covered by the mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Part III of the Mandatory Insurance Policy Association;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and the main sentence of Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is divided and reflected by the defendant, the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the defendant has recently subscribed to liability insurance, etc. shall be determined as the same as the order.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaged in driving of CPoter trucks.

On March 20, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on March 13:25, 2014, and proceeded with the front distance of the Sejong Northern-gu Gyeong-gu Master Logistics in front of the Sejong Northern-gu.

Since there is an intersection, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to proceed with another motor vehicle that enters the intersection by driving on the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant does not neglect his duty to temporarily stop or slowly and without entering the intersection, and does not discover the E-to be driven by the victim D(73 years of age) who has driven from the left side of the vehicle driving by the victim D(73 years of age) and is driving by the defendant on the right side of the above O-to-face.