1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The text of the judgment of the court of first instance is set forth.

The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows, except for the part from Nos. 4 to No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and part from No. 4 to No. 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Accordingly, according to the results of inquiry into appraiser E of the court of first instance, the sum of the rent from Nov. 13, 2008 to Jun. 12, 2015 of the part (A) out of the land of this case shall be 7,262,167 won [1,02,403 won (1,036,480 won x 353/365 days x 365 days x 365 days x 5 days hereinafter the same shall apply] from Nov. 13, 2008 to Oct. 31, 2009.

) Since the Plaintiff’s obligation to return unjust enrichment from November 1, 2009 to October 31, 201, 1,010,240 won to October 31, 201, 1,062,720 won to October 31, 201, and 1,15,200 won to October 31, 201, and 1,15,20 won to the Plaintiff during the period from November 1, 201 to October 31, 201, calculated at the rate of 1,141,440 won to October 31, 201, the Defendant’s obligation to return unjust enrichment from November 1, 201 to 205 to June 1, 2013 to 30, 1,930,000 won to the Plaintiff’s claim for restitution of unjust enrichment from June 1, 2013 to June 12, 2013 to 30.3.

If so, by means of the reduction of claims in the trial.