1. The defendant shall pay the plaintiffs the amount claimed by the plaintiff in attached Form 1 as stated in the "amount claimed" and each of the above amounts.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiffs, who are the Defendant’s employees operating hotel business, provided the Defendant’s work to perform the guest room management business, etc. of the Defendant’s hotel (hereinafter “instant hotel”) during the period indicated in the “period of employment” in the “period of employment” of the Plaintiff’s attached Table 2.

B. The Defendant did not pay the Plaintiffs the relevant amount of money for the relevant item from February 1, 2017 to March 21, 2017 (Provided, That Plaintiff 36, from February 1, 2017 to March 22, 2017, Plaintiff 36, respectively) as indicated in the “wages”, “retirement allowances”, and “annual allowances, etc.” among the specifications of the overdue payment by Plaintiff 2 for each Plaintiff.

Matters of special agreement

1. AO shall decide to lend the wages in arrears of the defendant to the worker, and the worker shall pay the wages in arrears immediately after receiving the wages in arrears from the defendant;

Provided, That where a loan is withdrawn before repayment, it shall be made immediately.

C. After retirement from the Defendant Company, on March 22, 2017 (However, on March 23, 2017, Plaintiff 36) entered into a new employment contract with AO Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “AO”) and entered into the following special agreements:

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 (including virtual number), 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Defendant asserted that the defense prior to the merits is questionable whether the rest of the Plaintiffs, other than the Plaintiff A, granted the Plaintiffs’ legal representative of the instant lawsuit, and that the defect of the legal representative is claimed.

However, according to the statement of the attached document submitted by the plaintiffs' legal representative, the plaintiffs' legal representative appears to have lawfully granted the plaintiffs' right of attorney of this case, and it is insufficient to reverse this only with the evidence Nos. 4 and 6 (including the paper number).

Therefore, the defendant's defense prior to the merits is without merit.

3. Judgment on the merits

A. According to the above facts found in the occurrence of the obligation to pay wages, etc., the defendant shall, unless there are special circumstances, be the plaintiffs.