1. Of the instant lawsuits, the statement “No.S. Appraisal Amount” is indicated in the Plaintiffs’ respective Schedule of Calculation of Claim Amount.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Business name: Q business - Public notice of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy on November 2, 2015;

(b) The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on August 25, 2016 - Land subject to expropriation 1 through 5 as indicated in attached Table 2’s indication of real estate (hereinafter “instant land”): The starting date of expropriation: October 18, 2016 - Total amount of compensation for expropriation KRW 322,909,387 (the detailed details for each plaintiff shall be the same as the statement in the item on the calculation table of claim amount in attached Table 1)

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on February 23, 2017 - the amount of compensation for losses arising from the expropriation ruling - the amount increased to KRW 351,431,870 in total (the detailed details by Plaintiff are the same as the statement in the calculation table of claim amount in attached Table 1) 351,431,870 (the amount of compensation for losses arising from each Plaintiff’s expropriation ruling is the same as the statement in attached Table 1, 6-1, 2, 7-1, 2, 7-1, 18, 18, 1 through 6, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Determination

A. Summary 1 of the plaintiffs' assertion 1) Claim for the increased amount of compensation for losses (attached Form 1 in the calculation sheet of the amount of compensation for losses, the claim for payment of the amount corresponding to the column No. 3.

(2) As to the claim for compensation for losses due to a decrease in the price of the remaining land (attached Form 1, referred to as "No.4 appraisal"; hereinafter the same shall apply) on August 25, 2016, the compensation for losses arising from the decline in the price of the remaining land and the land stipulated in Articles 6 through 11 (hereinafter referred to as "the remaining land of this case") indicated in the indication of Attached Property 2 excluded from the object of expropriation according to the adjudication of expropriation on August 25, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as "the remaining land of this case"), the Defendant sought compensation for losses arising from the decline in the price of the remaining land of this case resulting from the expropriation of the land of this case.

This part of the plaintiffs' claim is examined, and the plaintiffs' claim is stated in the complaint of this case. "The defendant is against the plaintiffs, respectively.