1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs the amount of money stated in the "personal fee" list of additional dues for each plaintiff in attached Form 3.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business outline - Business Category - Housing redevelopment and rearrangement - Business Name: RAB - Housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Location: Seoul S only - Authorization for project implementation: The Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Public Notice T on June 1, 2012

B. The Plaintiffs are eligible for business compensation within the instant project district, such as the entry of the Plaintiff’s eligibility for compensation.

C. The defendant from January 21, 2013 to the same year

2. Until March 28, 2012, the Plaintiffs did not comply with the agreement on the grounds that the amount of compensation for business compensation was low. On March 14, 2013, the Plaintiffs filed an application for adjudication with the Defendant and served the Defendant on March 15, 2013.

On April 23, 2013, the Defendant applied for the adjudication of expropriation to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Tribunal. On July 19, 2013, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Tribunal rendered the adjudication of expropriation (hereinafter “the first adjudication of expropriation”). However, the Defendant failed to pay or deposit compensation by September 6, 2013, which is the starting date of expropriation, and thus becomes null and void. E. The Defendant again applied for the adjudication of expropriation to the Seoul Regional Land Tribunal on November 5, 2013 as the adjudication of expropriation becomes null and void, and the Seoul Regional Land Tribunal again rendered the adjudication of expropriation on February 4, 2014 (hereinafter “2nd adjudication”), which is the date of expropriation, and the list of the Plaintiffs’ compensation amount as stated in the attached Table 3.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 4 (including all of the virtual numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The defendant's assertion that the plaintiffs filed an application for adjudication on March 15, 2013, the above adjudication is made because it did not pay or deposit the compensation determined by the adjudication of expropriation.