1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The scope of the judgment at this court claimed the increase in compensation for losses for real estate subject to expropriation and additional dues due to the delay of the defendant's application for adjudication. The court of first instance accepted the part of the plaintiffs' claim to increase compensation for losses and dismissed the part of the claim

Therefore, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the claim for additional dues, which is the part against the plaintiffs, since only the plaintiffs appealed against their lost part.

2. Details of ruling;

(a) Business title - Business title: I Housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as "project in this case"): Defendant - Business Area: Seongbuk-gu Seoul J one - Project implementation authorization: K on June 1, 2012

B. The Plaintiffs own each part of the land and its ground obstacles within the instant project zone (hereinafter “real estate subject to expropriation”).

C. The defendant from January 21, 2013 to the same year

2. Until February 28, 2012, the Plaintiffs and the Plaintiffs agreed on the compensation for real estate subject to expropriation, but the Plaintiffs failed to comply with the agreement on the grounds that the compensation for losses was set at low level, and filed an application for adjudication to the Defendant on February 28, 2013, and the written request was served on the Defendant on March 4, 2013.

Accordingly, on March 4, 2013, the defendant applied for expropriation of the real estate subject to expropriation to the local Land Expropriation Committee of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Local Land Expropriation Committee of Seoul Special Metropolitan City on July 19, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "the first adjudication on expropriation") on September 6, 2013.

B, although the defendant did not pay or deposit the compensation for losses by the commencement date of expropriation, the first ruling became null and void.

E. On November 5, 2013, as the first expropriation ruling becomes null and void, the Defendant again applied for a new expropriation ruling to the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City on February 4, 2014 on April 4, 2014.