1. The Defendant’s payment order against the Plaintiff is based on the payment order (2012j. 20) rendered by the Military Court of Suan District for the Defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. Article 7(1) of the former State Property Act (amended by Act No. 2950, Dec. 31, 1976); Article 7(1) of the former State Property Act (amended by Act No. 2950, Dec. 31, 1976) provides that the employee of the National Tax Service who was an employee of the former National Tax Service from around 1971 to around 1985 shall not acquire, or exchange, any State-owned property with his own property: Provided, That this shall not apply in a case where the pertinent Office’s permission was obtained. (2) The act of violating the provisions of paragraph (1) is null and void. (2) The act of violating the provisions of paragraph (1) must be deemed null and void. (2) B was illegally converted into a State-owned land in the name of Nonparty C, the name of his own Dong, and the land indicated in paragraph (10) of the attached Table No. 1 to Nonparty D, the following name, and Nonparty D, the spouse of Nonparty 13, and Nonparty 14.

(B) On July 29, 1983, the Plaintiff, as his human relative, forged the certificate of real estate sale under the name of the Director of the Gwangju Regional Tax Office as if the name of the purchaser was lawfully transferred each of the State-owned lands of this case from F, etc. (B) and the Defendant prepared guidelines for the payment of restitution compensation in order to protect a third party who bought and acquired the State-owned lands in good faith from B in the course of recovering the State-owned lands by unlawful means as seen above.

The main contents of the guidelines are that the state-owned land purchased by B in the name of relatives is sold or acquired in good faith and registered as the owner or transferred to a third party.