logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.05.12 2015구단7206
진료계획불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the instant disposition

A. On November 23, 2010, the Plaintiff provided medical treatment until November 30, 2012 after receiving medical treatment approval from the Defendant, on the ground of occupational accidents falling at a height of 10 meters at the construction site located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, such as “acheon Drilla,cheon Drilla, US Drilla, Drilla, Drilla, unfredrated frated frat, separated frat, distributed salt, stoves damage (the foregoing shall apply to the base approved disease below)” due to the Defendant’s injury, such as metal scrap, light frat, and bratal frat, etc.

B. On September 12, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) obtained approval for additional medical care on the discovery of symptoms in the chronology No. 5 and No. 1; and (b) obtained approval for additional medical care; (c) on November 24, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted a plan for treatment of the instant case in accordance with the result of the parallel treatment with anesthesia surgery; (d) “The treatment need to be conducted in a state where there is an opinion that the treatment need to be conducted in parallel with the anesthesia surgery; (e) the treatment period from December 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014; (e) the treatment period should be completed according to the opinion of the director of the B hospital clinic, which provides that “The treatment period should be taken in a state where the treatment is conducted in a state where the results of the parallel treatment with anesthesia surgery by an surgery medical institution; and (e) the treatment plan should be completed after the completion of the treatment as a result of the examination by the Defendant on December 131, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 10, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion continues to provide pains even after he/she underwent several operations on November 23, 2010 due to occupational accidents, and even after the surgery on April 2014, the remainder of the vertebrate, which remains, and thus, the Plaintiff’s low-forest, pain and pains, and the left ray of the left ray are difficult to walk.

arrow