logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2016.04.28 2014가단34354
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant medical corporation B (hereinafter “Defendant foundation”) is a non-profit medical corporation with the purpose of establishing and operating a medical institution and contributing to the improvement of public health through research and development on health and medical services.

Defendant C is a doctor employed by the Defendant Foundation and working at the D Hospital operated by the Defendant Foundation (hereinafter referred to as “D Hospital”).

B. On March 25, 2013, the Plaintiff was discharged to D Hospital due to the climatic, climatic, and sculatory pain.

C. On April 1, 2014, Defendant C, a doctor outside the hospital’s static surgery, performed invertebrate surgery and high-frequency spine ebrate surgery to the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “the first procedure of this case”) d.

On April 1, 2013, Defendant C re-entered the Plaintiff with inverte inverte and inverte inverte vertebrate, which are the same as the instant primary procedure, to the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “the second procedure of this case”). E.

On April 8, 2013, Defendant C administered the Plaintiff with vertebrate cryp removal surgery and disc removal surgery.

(B) The Plaintiff was hospitalized in the hospital for about 17 days from May 27, 2014 to June 12, 2014, as the symptoms of the leg low-income and the establishment of the facility for the establishment of a new bridge have deteriorated and the pains have not been recovered, notwithstanding the first and second procedures in the instant case and the third procedures in the instant case.

G. On June 17, 2014, the Plaintiff received surgery between the 1st and the 2nd surgery, and the 3/4th surgery of the 3/4th of the 2014 when the symptoms worsen, notwithstanding the 3th surgery and hospitalization of the instant case.

(hereinafter referred to as “the fourth operation of this case”). 【The ground for recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, each entry of evidence A Nos. 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff was in the D Hospital to undergo a surgery and operation from Defendant C in order to alleviate the climatic, climatic, and sclimatic pains, and was in need of the improvement of symptoms.

arrow