logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.11.22 2016고단866
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On April 24, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million by the Changwon District Court for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

【Criminal Facts】

"2016 Highest 866"

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act;

A. On June 29, 2016, at around 21:10, the Defendant driven a Cscopa car while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.089% without a car driver’s license at approximately 13 km from the Do in front of the old west-gun, west-gun, Haak-gun, the Republic of Korea, to the roads adjacent to the malyang-gun, in the same military waters of the Republic of Korea.

B. On July 1, 2016, at around 10:30, the Defendant driven a car with the above spectrum while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.234% without a car driver’s license in the five-meter radius of the Gun North-west Office of the Gun, North-west, Gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, Seoul, while under the influence of alcohol without a car driver’s license.

2. On June 29, 2016, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, at around 21:31, the Defendant: (a) controlled the Defendant’s drinking on the road near the malicious bridge as indicated in paragraph (1); (b) used the Defendant’s relative F resident registration number as if the Defendant’s resident registration number was the Defendant’s resident registration number; (c) used the Defendant’s relative F resident registration number as if he was the Defendant’s resident registration number.

3. On June 29, 2016, the Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (2), and at the place specified in paragraph (2), the Defendant: (a) drafted another’s signature for the purpose of exercising the signature by means of digital signature as if he/she was a F’s signature on the front page of the aforementioned terminal amount purification page; and (b) presented the forged signature to E, as if he/she had been duly formed, the circumstances leading up to the conclusion of the signature.

4.

arrow