The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the offense of insult and a justifiable act, thereby falling under a justifiable act under Article 20 of the Criminal Act, even though the defendant acknowledged the facts of insulting G and E, and this does not constitute an act contrary to the social norms, which led to the misapprehension of the legal principles as to the offense of insult and a justifiable act.

2. The Defendant was a former E reporter as D reporters of the instant facts charged.

A. On July 4, 2013, the Defendant, via Internet D around July 4, 2013, is close to viewing the case in which F, F, and F, and F, E, while putting the awareness that F, would dismiss existing reporters and extract new reporters, read “under the title of F,” the case in which news was completely broken by extracting the container under the title of “.”

We am see the main department, and see the E’s public performance and reliability as the head of the E’s office, and talked with G and E to interview a person who is in the remaining place at the time of the Embry. After inserting an interview around June 2012 with G, G took a speech to the effect that G accounts for a remaining place as a Gu-shotist, which was put into the long-term strike of the E’s labor.

B. On May 8, 2014, through Internet D around May 2014, the Defendant: (a) stuffed G Articles that the Defendant distorted the effect of Dice labeling to the family members of Hoho-gu in the Sewol ferry; and (b) seeed the news articles that the Defendant franced by H during the strike period; (c) inserted the interview with G around June 2012; and (d) inserted the name of the reporter and damaged the public broadcast E.

Ma000 Ma300

Many kinds of broadcasts are not the news created by the containerer, but the news created by the containerer.

I would like to fall down to the public wave. "I am Ma and E by speaking."

3. Determination

A. The offense of insult referred to in the offense of insult is a fact.