The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is the victim B, and the defendant reported the victim to the Financial Supervisory Service and received a telephone from the Financial Supervisory Service in connection with coverage of the victim. Thus, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case by pointing out false facts and impairing the reputation of the victim, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged in accordance with the records of the judgment: (i) around March 2010, the Defendant borrowed KRW 3 million from the victim in the number of days in the day, but paid the principal KRW 2 million, and the Defendant did not pay the remainder of the principal, which was attached to movables, such as clothes repair failure machinery, etc. owned by the Defendant by the victim on February 2012; (ii) the victim was operating a credit business without permission at the time of lending money to the Defendant; (iii) it is difficult to deem that the victim immediately constitutes a so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called “so-called bad corporate bond business operator; and (iii) the victim had interview himself and herself by the Financial Supervisory Commission.

(4) The Defendant, E, H, and I stated to the effect that he had no way to conduct an interview, and all of the Defendant’s figures stated to the effect that he “the victim, who is a malicious bond business operator,” was “the victim,” and there is no evidence to suspect the credibility of the statement in light of the relationship between the Defendant and his wife, the situation at the time when the statement was made, and the circumstances before and after the statement, etc., and (5) although the Defendant only stated to the J the above purport, the Defendant merely stated to the J, E, H, and I.