Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2012, the Defendant: (a) expressed a dispute over the community fund issue under the above C residents and the Defendant’s clan funeral title around Sejong City on August 19, 2012; and (b) expressed the victim D (57 years of age) expressed the victim’s face and fry of the victim’s fry who was used by the Defendant for the “frighting fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant's judgment as to the defendant's and his defense counsel's assertion of injury constitutes self-defense or excessive defense, since the defendant's face was taken in the process of defense by showing the defendant's attitude to attack, such as the defendant's fry and frying of smuggling when the defendant was used.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above, i.e., the victim appears to see why the defendant expressed her desire to her hye his hye and her hye to her hye, and that the defendant seems to her hye to hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye hye

Even if the above act by the defendant against this act cannot be deemed to have exercised a tangible force only within the limit of passive defense as a means of resistance to protect himself/herself from the unilateral illegal attack by the victim, and it is reasonable to view that the defendant's act was caused by his/her intent to attack, and therefore, the above assertion by the defendant and the defense counsel, such as self-defense or excessive defense, is acceptable.