logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.23 2018가단5133826
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Defendant points out to the Plaintiff each point of the attached map No. 1,2,3,4,1 of the real estate 115.64 square meters on the 1st floor listed in the attached list.

Reasons

1. On March 2, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) agreed to terminate the lease agreement if the Defendant fails to pay the rent for at least two months, by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 10,00,000,000, monthly rent, KRW 1,900,000, and the lease period from March 15, 2017 to March 14, 2018; and (b) the Plaintiff agreed to terminate the lease agreement if the Defendant fails to pay the rent for at least two months.

However, the defendant did not delay the rent of December 2017 and the rent of January 2018, and the renewal contract was not made around the expiration of the lease term.

Therefore, since the lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant was terminated, the defendant is obligated to order the plaintiff to clarify the lease object.

2. Article 208 (3) 1 and Article 257 of the Civil Procedure Act.

arrow