1. The Defendant’s KRW 187,462,476 as well as its annual 6% from September 20, 2014 to November 18, 2015, and the following.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 26, 2011, the Plaintiff concluded a contract with the Defendant for the construction cost of 3,585,218,880 won, and the construction period from January 6, 2012 to July 3, 2012 (hereinafter “instant contract”).

3. No change in the construction period due to a change in the construction cost as of June 27, 2012; 3,824,292; 29. No change in the construction period due to an additional process, such as excavation investigation of cultural heritage without a change in December 31, 2012; or subway structure investigation service; 3,824,292; 790, Seoul; and no change in the construction method due to an increase in the volume of government-funded materials; 3. No change in the construction period due to a change in the construction period as of December 21, 2012; 3. No change in the construction period as of April 30, 2013; 4. No change in the construction period as of June 30, 2013; 3. No change in the construction period as of June 12, 2013; 4. No change in the construction period as of 3. No change in the construction period due to an additional construction type;

B. After that, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded each of the instant contract changes as indicated below on the grounds of design change, extension of construction period, etc.

Finally, the construction cost of the instant contract was increased to KRW 4,232,630,380, and the deadline for completion was extended to September 30, 2013.

C. On March 19, 2013, the Plaintiff claimed that the Defendant pay the additional indirect construction cost due to the extension of the construction period until that time. On September 13, 2013, the Plaintiff added the extension of the construction period to the Defendant around that time.