The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are favorable: (a) the Defendant recognized each of the instant crimes and against whom all of the instant crimes were committed; (b) paid the victims full amount of damages; and (c) the victim F does not want to be punished against the Defendant; and (d) the fact that the said victim should take into account equity with the case where the judgment is to be rendered simultaneously with each of the crimes indicated in the lower judgment.

However, in light of the law, frequency, etc., each of the crimes of this case, including unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the nature of the crime is not good in light of the law, the fact that the victim E and G did not receive a letter from the victim, and the fact that there was a record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and other circumstances that are conditions for the sentencing of this case as indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, circumstances of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is judged to be appropriate and it is not too unreasonable, therefore, the defendant

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.