logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.08.13 2018노1453
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) and the judgment of the court below (defendant A: 1-A, b. 1-2 as stated in the judgment of the court below), C.

The imprisonment with prison labor of 8 months, the 1-B.3 months, and the 2-month imprisonment with prison labor of 2 months and 2 months) are too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Defendant A recognizes all of the instant crimes and reflects them, and Defendant A’s each of the instant crimes ought to take into account the equity between the case and the case where the judgment on the facts in the judgment of the court below becomes final and conclusive at the same time with the case where each of the instant crimes was committed.

However, Defendant A committed a violation of the Act on the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts on May 22, 2013 (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) without being aware of the fact that Defendant A committed a violation of the Act on the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) even though he/she was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in the period of suspension of execution on May 22, 2013. In addition, Defendant A committed a violation of the Act on the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) after committing a crime of violation of the Act on the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) in order to be exempted from punishment after committing a crime of violation of the Act on the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts), including the fact that the circumstances after committing the crime are not good enough, and in full view of all other circumstances, Defendant A’s age, sexual behavior, environment, and circumstances after committing the crime

B. Defendant B recognized and opposed to the instant crime, and Defendant B’s crime of this case ought to take into account the equity between the case and the case where the judgment on the facts entered in the judgment of the lower court becomes final and conclusive at the same time.

However, the crime of this case continues to engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic without suspending the business immediately after Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to the violation of the Act on the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts.

arrow