logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2017.11.09 2017고단174
신용정보의이용및보호에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an agricultural employee of the Gyeongbuk Military Corps.

No person who is or was an executive or employee of a credit information company, etc. shall divulge or use any personal confidential information, including credit information and privacy acquired during the course of business for non-business purposes

Nevertheless, on August 5, 2010, while the Defendant was working as an employee of a financial institution at the NA A branch located in the Gyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant, without permission, inquired of the details of the use of NHFC card (the details of the use of the post-paid card), which is an individual credit information of the victim E, and printed out the data. On May 17, 2017, the Defendant submitted a copy of the “NHFC card use details (the details of the use of the post-paid card)” in the name of the victim acquired in the competent division in charge of the case No. 2017Reu 4201 of the above court at the Jung-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, without consent of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant used personal secrets such as credit information and privacy of the victim that he came to know in the course of his duties for purposes other than his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. An employment certificate and a personnel record card;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 50 (1) and Article 42 (1) of the Act on the Use and Protection of Credit Information concerning the relevant criminal facts and Articles 50 (1) and 42 (1) of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Provisional Payment Order is committed under the condition that the defendant, who is an employee of a financial institution, has printed out without permission the details of the use of the son's personal information by the victim, who was his husband, and submitted them to the full bench in charge of a divorce lawsuit with the victim and used them for other than the purpose of business, and that the nature of the crime

However, the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflected, and the injured person is punished by the defendant by the unanimous agreement with the victim.

arrow