logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.28 2012고합84 (1)
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(횡령)등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. Co-defendant C, D, and E, co-defendant C, D, and E (hereinafter each co-defendant C, D, and E (hereinafter each of the co-defendant C, D, and E) had been changed from July 21, 2008 to the victims who were customers of the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "F") to act as an agent for the loan of installment financing and the loan of installment financing to the victims who were customers of the F Co-Defendant C, D, and E, and had purchased the loan by forging the documents related to the transfer of the vehicle without the consent of the victims.

1) A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) was the F representative director of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H 410 from April 2007 to August 2008, and engaged in the implementation of used vehicle installment loans, automobile leasing, siren, etc. From around October 19, 2007 to around 08, C applied for loans of KRW 50 million from the victim I to the Daewoo Capital Co., Ltd. for loans of KRW 30 million for the victim I and applied for loans from KRW 70,000,000 to the victims of Samsung 10,000,000,000 from around 0, to around 7, 2007, after completing the transfer of ownership on behalf of the victims, the victims of the above vehicle from around 10, 207 to around 10, 200, 300,000, 19,000, 30,000

arrow