1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff had no intention to marry from the beginning, but he had the intention to marry with the plaintiff, and was given KRW 101,197,00,000 in total under the name of living expenses, such as deceiving the plaintiff as if he had the intention to marry, demanding monthly living expenses of KRW 3 million from the plaintiff, and 30,000,000 in total under the name of lease deposit.

The plaintiff suffered serious stress to the extent that the above tort committed by the defendant was unable to bring about a serious depression, and was economically and economically in excess of his/her obligations.

The defendant is obligated to pay 11,197,000 won plus 10,000,000 won for consolation money due to the plaintiff's mental suffering and damages for delay.

After the Defendant divorced on November 5, 2013, the Defendant had experienced economic difficulties and her two children.

The defendant served in a singing room, and the plaintiff who was found to be a customer was able to communicate with him, and the plaintiff first paid the defendant a debt and paid his living expenses to the defendant, and the defendant was prevented from doing any work by singing.

The plaintiff, such as installing apps for tracking location in the defendant mobile phone, has interfered with and gathered the defendant.

The plaintiff was engaged in violent behavior when drinking only, and even assaulted the defendant's children.

For this reason, the plaintiff and the defendant are eventually responsible to the plaintiff, and the defendant does not have any intention to marry, and there is no way to demand the plaintiff to pay the money by visiting the marriage, even though there is no intention to marry.

Judgment

A. According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 and the entire pleadings, the plaintiff seems to have remitted or paid a considerable amount to the defendant.

B. However, the Plaintiff: (a) provided the Defendant, who had worked in a singing room located at the early 2017 police officer, from that time, to April 2018; and (b) the Plaintiff and the Defendant from the end of 2017 to the end of 2018.