logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.08.16 2015나2066975
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the remainder of the Defendants except for the Defendant Electric Construction Financial Cooperative is as follows.

Reasons

1. The scope of this court's judgment in the first instance court: (a) the Plaintiff sought a payment of the damages in lieu of the defect repair and the damages due to incomplete performance to the Plaintiff jointly and severally; (b) the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association jointly and severally with the above Defendants to pay the warranty bond; (c) the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association claimed that the Plaintiff jointly and severally pay the damages in lieu of the defect repair and due to incomplete performance to the Plaintiff; (d) the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association shall jointly and severally pay the warranty bond to the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association; (e) the payment of the warranty bond to the Plaintiff; (e) the payment of the damages in lieu of the defect repair and due to incomplete performance to the Plaintiff; and (e) the payment of the warranty bond to the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association jointly and severally with the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association; and (e) the payment of the warranty bond to the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association for the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association; and (e) the payment of the warranty bond to the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association for the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association in the first instance trial.

However, the court of first instance, among the above claims of the plaintiff, dismissed the claim for the return of unjust enrichment against the defendant's completion construction, etech construction, trimul fire fighting, ice fire fighting, and co-defendant's common electricity in the first instance court, and partly accepted the claim for damages in lieu of defect repair against the above defendants and large power, and the claim for damages due to incomplete performance, and partly accepted the plaintiff's claim for the warranty bond against the defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association and the Electrical Mutual Aid Association

As to this, the defendant's completion construction, Etech construction, etc.

arrow