1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won;

2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is between the victim B and the victim.

1. On April 23, 2013, at around 21:45, the Defendant: (a) assaulted the victim at “Dju point” operated by the victim B (the 26 years of age) who was in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, and obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the victim’s main store by force by force, such as: (b) destroying the two weeks of 259,000 won in total, which was displayed on the tegical table, by cutting the teging the table table on the tegs, by hand, and destroying the two weeks of 1,00 won in total; and (c) destroying the teglthic 1 disease; and (d) continuing to break the tegic eglthic shot; and (e) obstructing the victim’s main store business by force.

2. On April 23, 2013, at around 23:15, the Defendant: (a) found the victim at the same place as the foregoing paragraph, and then destroyed the victim’s property in an amount equivalent to KRW 810,000,000 in total by destroying a decoration, liquid, two-way 4 disease ( Commission 2 disease, Lesamati 1 disease, Hosama 1 disease), handphones, bronphones, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of each police statement concerning B;

1. A report on internal investigation (related to the failure to attach a written statement and a written estimate on two occasions);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and field photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

4. Part concerning the dismissal of prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On April 23, 2013, at around 21:45, the Defendant: (a) found the victim B (here, 26 years of age) in Kimhae-si, “Djuk” operated by the victim B (here, her 26 years of age) and assaulted the victim on the ground that he/she did not drink with another male and female, and did not contact with him/her; and (b) used the victim as “the victim’s day to the end of the day to the end of the day to the end of the day,” and used the victim’s s

2. We examine the judgment.