Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates the “D” main points in Daegu Seo-gu C.

At around 23:43 on November 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received a request to provide a contact loan from an unexplosive customer; (b) contacted the sidewalk operated by E to the above main points; (c) made the said female contact to encourage the male visitors to provide entertainment; (d) made the said female contact to provide an unexplosive male visitors with a sexual intercourse within the said main points; (c) in return, 1.20,00 won from the customers, 20,000 won in total, 3.20,000 won in total, and 20,000 won in total, and arranged to provide a sexual traffic, as described in the attached Table 1 through 20, from that date to August 28, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Copy of the prosecutor's statement concerning E;

1. A copy of the third police interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (in relation to attachment of a copy of judgment, attachment of E statement of statement, attachment of news release room business E, F copy of judgment, and analysis of digital evidence);

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the selection of a fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Judgment on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act that bear litigation costs

1. The Defendant, on April 2015, received the said D entertainment tavern around April 2015, and was not involved in the conduct Nos. 1 through 18 of the Attached Crimes List No. 2009, which occurred earlier.

2. However, unlike the evidence presented in the judgment and the following circumstances acknowledged by it, unlike the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant’s cellular phone run by E in the name of the Defendant even before April 2015.