beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On June 24, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Changwon District Court’s Tong-gu branch on June 24, 2013.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Grandroth.
On 19:00 on 23, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle, and proceeded at a non-speed speed from the new village distance room to the terminal surface in front of CD at the time of macro-stopping.
A person engaging in driving service of motor vehicles has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reporting the traffic situation well and driving safely.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.049%, neglected to perform the above duty of care and did so on the front section of the Defendant’s front part of the FK3 car driven by the Victim E (FK 27 years old) who was in the atmosphere of the signal at the front section of the vehicle.
As a result, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, approximately two weeks, from the victim E and the victim G (Nam, 27 years of age) who was on the same part of the victim, the above victim suffered approximately two weeks of care to the Ha (Nam, 23 years of age) who was on the back of the damaged vehicle, and the Ha (Nam, 23 years of age) who was on the right side of the damaged vehicle.
2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.049% from a section of about 100 km from the 100km parking lot in front of the Istudio in Gwangju-si, the same time as the preceding paragraph to the Dao-si, Gyeongnam-si.
Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving (Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act) not less than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement;
1. Medical certificate (H), medical certificate (E), and medical certificate (G);
1. An accident site photograph;
1. Notification of a survey report on actual condition and the control of drinking driving;
1. A previous conviction in judgment: