logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.08.21 2015가단216240
기타(금전)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 90,300 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from May 15, 2015 to August 21, 2015, and from August 22, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 1, 2013, the Plaintiff’s wife concluded a lease agreement between the Defendant and the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant apartment”) setting the deposit amount of KRW 200 million and the term of the lease from December 20, 2013 to December 19, 2015 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

B. Since then, while the Plaintiff was prepared to move into the apartment of this case, the Plaintiff discovered water leakage in the apartment of this case and requested the Defendant to repair the apartment of this case. Accordingly, the Defendant accepted the air conditioning pipe, etc. at the entrance of the boiler room, by walking the inside floor of the string ward.

C. After that, on December 20, 2013, the Plaintiff moved into the instant apartment and resided together with the wife, etc. on the ground of water leakage around September 2014, and decided that the Plaintiff will live on the floor of the instant apartment due to water leakage, etc., and that the Plaintiff would become a director in the instant apartment due to water leakage, etc. to the Defendant, and the Defendant consented thereto, and became a new lessee, and the Plaintiff was a director in the instant apartment on December 5, 2014.

The plaintiff resided in the apartment of this case, and paid KRW 75,300 to the long-term repair appropriations including management expenses.

In addition, on January 23, 2014, when the boiler of the apartment of this case was out of order, the Defendant was contacted with the Defendant on January 23, 2014, and the Defendant was provided with repair engineer and then the Defendant was consulted to claim the cost later, and then the said repair was completed and the boiler repair engineer was paid KRW 15,000 as the

[Based on recognition] The descriptions of Gap 1-4, Gap 6, 7, Gap 10, Gap 13-1-9, Gap 14, Gap 15-1 to 14, video, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the above facts, the defendant's long-term repair appropriations, and boiler repair costs claims are assessed against the plaintiff, barring special circumstances, totaling 90,300 won of long-term repair appropriations and boiler repair costs.

arrow