logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.09.24 2020고단3733
사기등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, the defendant from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On February 14, 2020, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for one year in the Incheon District Court due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 22, 2020.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. The Defendants advertised as if they were to sell a heavy difference at a price much less than the market price of a heavy difference that is not actually owned by the Internet Blogs, and enticed the customer to report it to sell it, and then there is an unexpected additional amount, which led the Defendants to waive the contract for the relevant heavy difference, and conspired to acquire the profits by selling the other heavy difference at a price lower than the market price.

Defendant

B around July 26, 2019, at the D office operated by himself/herself in Seo-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, advertising as if he/she did not own a number-free food car at the D office and sold it more than 5.8 million won than the market price. Defendant A reported and contacted the advertisement to the victim E, “it is possible to sell it at a price lower than the market price for the auction vehicle.” On July 27, 2019, he/she induced the victim to the F office in the above C around July 27, 2019, and after the victim's domestic vehicle and parts were different from the vehicle in the U.S., the vehicle cannot be repaired even if the vehicle is broken. After the purchase of the vehicle, the victim was ordered to waive the purchase of the vehicle, and at that time, Defendant B, who was contacted by the Defendant A, appeared in the above office, and sold the vehicle at a price lower than the market price.

However, in fact, the Defendants: (a) induced the victim to give up the purchase by the aforementioned false language; and (b) sold the G food car with the market price of KRW 11.3 million to the victim; and (c) sold the car at KRW 16.1 million.

arrow