1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 16, 2005, Korea approved and publicly notified a road construction project between Ggsan-U.S. under the Daejeon Regional Land Management Office’s notification No. 2005-211.

B. On March 22, 2007, the Central Land Tribunal owned the Plaintiff on ① 742 square meters in Seosan-si, ② 1,194 square meters in B, ③ 729 square meters in D, ④ 529 square meters in E field, ⑤ 7 square meters in F forest land: 62 square meters in G field 2,228 square meters in G, 7 square meters in G field 212 square meters in 72 square meters in 82, 602 square meters in G forest 340 square meters, 353 square meters in K forest 340 square meters, 304 square meters in K forest 353 square meters in 11 square meters in the order above (hereinafter “instant number”). Based on the appraisal and assessment of the appraisal corporation and Korea, the said 11 land is subject to expropriation, and 50,513,850 won in each of the instant land, and 9820 square meters in expropriation and expropriation.

C. Following the Plaintiff’s objection to the above acceptance ruling, Korea made an objection on July 19, 2007, on the basis of the appraisal and assessment by the appraisal and assessment corporation and dialogue appraisal and assessment corporation of each land of this case, which increases the compensation amount to KRW 446,026,10, 22,780,810, total of 468,806,910 (hereinafter “the instant objection ruling”). D.

The plaintiff did not reflect the officially assessed individual land price at the time of the expropriation ruling, even though the specific use area of each land of this case was changed to a management area, the price of the land of this case was not reflected. Doshe did not so, although the land of this case was merely a temporary use of the land of this case, it should not be evaluated as a site which is not a previous one in accordance with the land category and the current utilization. Doshe did not so. Doshe did not so, since the land of this case exists in part of the ground, the land of this case is a site not a previous one, and the land of this case is a site, not a miscellaneous land, because the land of this case is a building, and the land of this case is completed with concrete, and therefore the land of this case