The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the process of protesting against the public officials in charge of Seoul Special Metropolitan City who participated in the resident briefing session on B apartment renovation project held on September 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) misjudgmentation of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles; and (b) filed an objection against the public officials in charge of Seoul.

In response to the above renovation project, the president of the B Apartment D, who was the consent of the said renovation project as the president of the B Apartment D, only made a legitimate objection to the said renovation project, and did not sound the victim “Ig, Ig, Ig, Ig, Ig, Ign, Ig, Ign, Ig, Ig for the victim as if Igd, Ign, Ig, Ig for the victim as Ign for the victim by raising the interest in two hands,

B. The sentence (one million won of fine) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles and the following circumstances acknowledged thereby, the defendant's assertion is without merit since the defendant's carrying with himself a person who is a dangerous object, and could sufficiently recognize the fact of openly insulting the victim as stated in the judgment of the court below.

1) The victim stated in the investigative agency and the court below in detail and in detail the details of the Defendant’s assault details and contents, and the contents are consistent with the judgment below: “The Defendant was going to go to the public official, leading the victim to his own floor, leaving the front direction of the Defendant who was the victim, and intending to get the victim into two hands, and come to the head, thereby getting the victim into his hair, and intending to bring the victim up. The victim expressed his intention to “I am to go to the chairperson of the width, I am to am the victim, and I am to the victim. I am to say, “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am the victim’s distance at the time of the instant case, and I am to the extent that I m was about one meter.”