logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.19 2016고단8869
유가증권위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 2009, the Defendant (Seoul Central District Court G) acting for the process of acquiring the ownership of the said real estate through the auction procedure (Seoul Central District Court G) on No. 2 of the lower floor of the F Ground Building No. 2 in Dongjak-gu Seoul, Seoul.

On the other hand, the defendant stated the signature of E in blank under the pretext that it is necessary for the above auction procedure, and stated the proxy form, E's certificate of seal imprint, and the certificate of seal imprint, as if he had a monetary claim equivalent to KRW 30 million against E, and stated that he arbitrarily prepared a promissory note, etc. as if he had a monetary claim equivalent to KRW 30 million with respect to E, and tried to obtain pecuniary profits from the damaged person by receiving a notarized bill as if he had a monetary claim against E.

1. On December 14, 2009, the Defendant forged securities and forged private documents stated “A”, “H”, “H”, and “Seoul Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I Apartment Housing 101-506” on the proxy form with the signature of the above E written at around 14, 200, on the letter of proxy form stating the above E’s signature, with the pen’s name on the city’s number column, and then delegate the following matters to the above person at the bottom.

1. All the notarial deeds of a loan;

2.The interest rate of 30% per annum (2.5 parts);

3. The attached document seal impression verification 1 copy is stated as “A” and the document amount column is written as “A”, “30,000,000 won”, “14 December 2009,” and “Seoul Seongbuk-gu J 301 E” in the issuer column, respectively, in the form of a promissory note in the face of door-gu.

E’s seal has been affixed.

As a result, the Defendant committed a letter of delegation in the name of E, a private document, and a letter of promissory note in the name of E, a securities, respectively.

2. The fact that the Defendant, on December 14, 2009, was delegated by the said E Promissory Notes with respect to the authentication of the original and false entries therein at the “law firm L” office located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul.

arrow