Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Of the facts charged against the Defendant, the part of insultd against the victim D was decided to dismiss the public prosecution on June 21, 2019.
On October 27, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment with labor at the Busan District Court for the crime of interference with business, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on September 30, 2017.
1.(a)
On October 19, 2018, around 19:00, the Defendant lent money to the victim in the restaurant operated by the victim C (the 51-year-old, female) in Busan Sagu B, but was refused, the Defendant interfered with the operation of the restaurant by the victim by force for approximately twenty minutes, including: (a) a person who died within the inner knife and died of the knife, and (b) a person who died of the knife in the inner knife; (c) a knife is not a knife but a knife.
B. At around 15:00 as of January 1, 2019, the Defendant, at around 15:0, requested the victim to drink at a restaurant operated by the victim D (the 58-years and inn), but, as the Defendant was refused, expressed the victim’s bath to the large interest, such as “Chewing baby,” and collected scrap chairss, thereby interfering with the victim’s operation of the restaurant by force for about 30 minutes.
C. On February 10, 2019, around 14:00, the Defendant, within Schlage operated by the victim G (the age of 72, female) who was located in the Busan Yagu F, requested the victim to drink on credit, but, upon refusal, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to drink at a large rate of 20 minutes, and obstructed the victim’s Schlage’s work by force.
2. The Defendant, around 13:00 on March 12, 2019, expressed the Defendant’s desire to “a sprinke, sprinke, sprinke,” among customers on the ground that the victim did not sell alcohol at the restaurant of the above victim’s D’s operation, and, if the Defendant continued to do so, would have sprinked the victim as “a sprinke, sprinke, and will not do so, sprinke,” and would have obstructed the Defendant’s business, and would have the victim 4,00 won.