logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018. 05. 16. 선고 2017나2055672 판결
이 사건 증여행위는 사해행위에 해당하고 피고가 선의였다고 보기 어려움[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Hayang-2017-Shap70659 (O8, 2017.09)

Title

It is difficult to deem that the instant donation constitutes a fraudulent act and the Defendant was bona fide.

Summary

The gift of this case by a delinquent taxpayer to the defendant in a delinquent state is clear that it constitutes a fraudulent act with the purpose of undermining a taxation right holder in excess of his/her obligation, and it cannot be deemed that the defendant acted in good faith against a delinquent taxpayer's fraudulent act.

Related statutes

Article 406 of the Civil Act

Cases

Seoul High Court-2017-Na205672 (Law No. 16, 2018)

Plaintiff, Appellant

Korea

Defendant, appellant and appellant

KimA

Judgment of the first instance court

Suwon District Court and Senior District Court 2017-Gohap-70659 (O8, 2017.09)

Conclusion of Pleadings

2018.04.30

Imposition of Judgment

2018.05.16

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore civil

In accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Litigation Act, this shall be cited as it is (a certificate additionally submitted by the defendant at the trial).

Considering this, it is not different from the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court.

2. Conclusion

- 3-

If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted with due reason, and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be accepted.

As the conclusion is justified, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The decision shall be rendered as above.

arrow