logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2012.11.16 2012고합503
살인
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

Ⅰ. The Defendant was able to take care of the instant facts charged to victims E (V, 49 years of age) who operate a D cafeteria (hereinafter “D cafeteria”) in Pyeongtaek Daegu-gu. Daegu-gu.

From April 3, 2012 to 01:14 on the following day, the Defendant was refused to request the victim to drink alcohol in the above restaurant room and to teach the victim’s sexual intercourse. As such, the Defendant: (a) had the female die by light pressure from the place of the restaurant, and then had the female die by light pressure.

Ⅱ. Facts of recognition and the prosecution of the defendant;

1. Basic factual basis

A. The Defendant and the victim’s family relationship divorced from his wife around 1995, and the Defendant resided in Daegu-gu G from around three years to around the time of the instant case. The Defendant and the victim’s family relationship had worked as a water clinic in the family department located in Daegu Suwon-gu.

On the other hand, the victims are family members of H, big children I, small children J, their husbands and live in Daegu-gu K with their husbands and big children, and theJ, which is small children, is in military service.

B. The defendant and the victim's relationship and the victim's victim's D restaurant business type run D restaurant in Daegu-gu C from about five years to about 17:00 to 18:00, the victim usually opened a restaurant at around 03:00 to 000 of the following day and operated the restaurant until around 03:0-04:00 of the following day. In the case where the body is inside, there are harsh cases where the business was completed at around 01:0, and there was a heavy drinking, and there was a little brut at the D restaurant's room where the d restaurant was under heavy alcohol, but the victim was returning home after finishing the restaurant business, and locked at the d restaurant and worked on the next day. The victim was the victim on April 2, 2012, immediately before the date of this case.

4. 3. Around 03:30 to 04:00 returned home.

On the other hand, since the nature of the victim is active, written, and written, it is easy for customers to make a well-known, the D cafeteria has been a large number of descendants, and the victim has been a large number of victims.

arrow