logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.10.20 2017고단2045
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of five months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On May 2, 2017, the Defendant used the game machine No. 42 in Ulsan-gu B around 14:30 on May 2, 2017, and the Defendant used the game machine No. 42 on the victim D (63 tax) who is a customer, and was in a view of each other on the grounds that the Defendant used the game machine, the Defendant was suffering from the head of the victim’s math part and suffered from injury, such as the head 21 days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Reports on the occurrence of violence, investigation reports, and photographs (D); and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (amended by Act No. 62 of the Criminal Procedure) - In the event that the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (amended by Act No. 62 of the Republic of Korea / [the person subject to special sentencing] - the punishment for mitigation (including serious efforts to recover damage) or considerable damage is recovered [the scope of the recommended sentence] / two months or one year [the scope of the recommended sentence] - The main reason for suspension of execution (including serious efforts to recover damage) - At least two times the period of suspended sentence is not less than two times, the same and different types of punishment of the defendant, the progress from the content of the agreement in this case, and the reflection of the defendant

arrow