The defendant shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment against the defendant not guilty.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was that the Defendant, who actually operated “D” in Kuyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, ordered the installation of a human test with the Epathical department in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, and entered into a contract for the said works again to the victims.

Around October 1, 2010, the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim F to enter into the said contract with the victim F for the interior of the H office located in Boan-si, Boan-si, G, and the victim’s payment of construction cost according to the construction progress rate.

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the construction cost even if the victim implements the construction work.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim proceed with the Changju Corporation between October 201 and October 201, and did not pay KRW 10,932,50 for the construction cost, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the said amount.

B. Around October 1, 2010, the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim I for the installation of a dental plant at No. 1354, Bocheon-si, Bocheon-si, 1354, and fraudulently entered into the contract with the victim I for the installation of a dental plant at the victim I and E dental facilities and concluded that the victim would pay the construction cost according to the progress rate of the installation works.

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the construction cost even if the victim implements the construction work.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim proceed with the construction work between October 201 and October 201, and did not pay the construction cost of KRW 3,720,000, thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

C. On October 1, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim J concluded a contract for the above E D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D’ and concluded it falsely with the victim’s “to pay the construction cost according to the progress rate of construction.”

However, the facts are.