A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 22, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of five million won for the charge of forging private documents and uttering of falsified documents by the Seoul Western District Court.

The defendant is the representative of E (State) in Gwangju City D.

1. On February 25, 2010, while operating the aforesaid E (State), the Defendant entered into a purchase agreement with the Korea Western Power Headquarters for the purchase of goods with “F”. In such a case, according to the said agreement, the Defendant must supply the goods in compliance with the specifications specified in the agreement, such as the performance, quality of materials, the chemical ingredients, mechanical properties, etc. of the goods, and submit the test report to the relevant chemical power plant by requesting a testing institution to conduct a test at the time of delivery.

Nevertheless, the Defendant imported the said goods and requested a testing institution to conduct a test for a test, which was unable to submit them to a thermal power plant by the due date, and the Defendant was willing to request a testing institution to conduct a test for parts samples that had previously been in possession, other than parts to be supplied in order to meet the due date.

On March 9, 2010, the Defendant: (a) requested performance and quality tests to the KTRI Industrial Research Center for the samples of those parts, which are not “F” to be supplied according to a purchase contract entered into between the Korea Development Headquarters of Thaian and the E (State); and (b) on March 19, 2010, the Defendant was notified of the results of the examination falling short of the standard specifications by the employees G, and ordered the non-resident who is the employee to change the number of the said test report and the results of the examination.

From March 19, 2010 to February 2, 201 of the same month, the above employee’s name-dissatisfies the test report issued by the KATRI Industrial Environment Research Center on “F” at the above E (main office) office in compliance with the Defendant’s instructions, and stores it, and then uses a computer satisfy program to “I” other than “H of the original test report.”