logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2021.03.09 2020가단517306
공사대금
Text

The defendant assistant intervenor's application for intervention shall be dismissed.

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Of the costs of lawsuit, the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 11, 2019, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a contract for construction work with respect to “C Daegu Metropolitan City Arrangement Project,” which was ordered by the Defendant. The above contract was concluded on 2,604,113,630 won for total construction work, and on December 20, 202, the date of completion of the contract was 78,584,000 won, and the date of completion of the contract was 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,000 won.

(c)

Afterward, the Plaintiff asserts that the provisional attachment order of this case does not have effect pursuant to Article 88(1) of the Framework Act on Construction Industry with respect to KRW 89,141,80 equivalent to labor cost out of the amount of the original construction work under the instant construction contract. Accordingly, the Plaintiff sought payment of the said money, and filed against the Defendant on May 18, 2020.

arrow