1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The fact of recognition ① The Plaintiff is the insurer of C vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”), the Defendant is the insurer of D vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”), the Defendant is the insurer of the vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”), the Defendant’s vehicle proceeding two lanes around July 19, 2017 in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Nowon-do 119 Safety Center prior to the right-hand route, and attempted to combine the vehicle with it as it was. The vehicle is fixed as the vehicle is, and the vehicle is still parked on the right-hand route for a considerable period of time, ② the vehicle is located on the right-hand side of the Defendant vehicle at the time, and the vehicle of the Plaintiff’s 0 vehicle passes through the right-hand side of the vehicle of the Defendant vehicle and entered the vehicle as the vehicle of the Plaintiff’s 1 to the right-hand side of the vehicle of the Defendant, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle as the vehicle of the Plaintiff’s 1 to the right-hand side of the vehicle of the Plaintiff’s 1 to be parked as the vehicle of the Plaintiff 2.

2. The first instance court determined that the instant accident occurred both 60% of the negligence of the Plaintiff’s driver and 40% of the negligence of the Defendant’s driver. Accordingly, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant accident occurred due to the total negligence of the Defendant’s driver.

In full view of all the circumstances revealed in the recognition of the instant accident as seen earlier, it is unreasonable to the right-hand despite the fact that the Defendant’s vehicle could have anticipated that it stops for a right-hand way.