A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a D reporter in C.

1. On March 30, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime around March 18:27, 2017, as the title “G”, for the purpose of slandering the Victim F in the said D (E) around March 30, 2017, for the purpose of slandering the Victim F, and as the title “G”, the Defendant begins to be suspected of a disguised espionage as a disguised espionage, once she was adhered to the snow view of the F H and the view of the principal of the school, then open the secretariat and newspaper of various organizations for the purpose of killing, but the technology that colors a fixed espionage from the child psychological course of the principal of the FH and the principal of the school is to the extent that it remains inside the Korean Intellectual Property Office.

F All kinds of historical materials kept by the former H H inn and the head of the school, and material are influent arrival of information that a fixed espionage voluntarily delivered to his idea that he died,” and “The remainder I case that the former F H inn and the head of the F inn caused his espionage by leaving his espionage status to be shot, and that the former J inn and the head of the F inn and caused him to be the criminal record of his her act, shall not be shocked.” In view of the list of relics donated by the president of the F inn and the head of the K inn and the head of the F inn and the head of the K inn to the K inn Culture Center, the espionage was used for a disguised purpose of deceiving the employees of the inside, and there is no fluent donation made by the head of the K inn and the head of the F inn and the head of the K inn were donated as if he was his possession.

At the time of completing a counter-espionage education, the same person is like the voice of the General Commander at the time of completing the counter-espionage education.

The article posted the article stating that the article was “,” and then distributed and perused the article to many and unspecified persons by stating “L” under the victim’s evidentiary photographs.

However, the victim was not a counter-espionage, and there was no fact that he filed a complaint with the Director of the J Bureau, and only donated the relics in his custody to the K Culture Center, and there was no fact that he donated them as if he had been in his possession of a thing which is not valuable from a fixed counter-espionage.

Accordingly, the defendant has the intention to defame the victim through the information and communication network.